(T.T.Srinath, Metroplus, The Hidu, 3:02:2014)
________________________________
The famous preacher Robert Schuller often talked about
possibility thinking as opposed to probability thinking. He said, if one
resorts to possibility thinking, the individual will tend to gauge the
outcome in terms of ‘what can be’; while one who is pre-occupied with a
probability approach will compel himself/herself to anticipate outcome
as ‘what may be’.
The two approaches differ in that
possibility thinking equips the individual by infusing his attempt at a
task or deed with positivity, while the probability approach resorts to
mathematical chance.
In the latter the individual is propelled by logic, while in the former freewill and choice dominate.
When
we allow ourselves to look at possibilities, we are enthused by hope,
faith and positive anticipation; probability thinking tells us that
outcome follows a cause and effect trajectory, so we might as well
reconcile ourselves to ‘what might happen’ and await outcome. That we
have choice to cause change in attitude and thinking is absent.
Possibility thinking also encourages one to believe that the outcome will be desirable.
The
father of two young boys, one who the father felt tended to see the
downside only and the other son who always celebrated possibilities,
decided to gift each son a present. To the less positive he gave a
bicycle and to the one who seemed to be positive he gifted a basket of
horse dung. Said the less positive son, “Only this, now I will not get
the motor-cycle I so much wanted for Papa has spent his money on getting
me a cycle”.
By contrast, said the son who had
received the horse dung, “If my father has given me a basketful of horse
dung, then surely there must be a horse to follow”.
Possibility thinking returns cheer to our lives.
Labels: Life, Self development
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home