The decision to award this year’s Man Booker Prize to the virtually
unknown 28-year-old New Zealand writer Eleanor Catton for her
door-stopper of a novel, The Luminaries, is as much a recognition
of a new voice as proof that the Booker judges’ capacity to surprise
remains undiminished. In a year when the critics and bookies were
rooting for one of the shortest novels in contention — the British
writer Jim Grace’s Harvest — they went and chose the longest (The
Luminaries clocks in at 832 pages) and the most formally structured
contender. Yet in the past they have gone for novels that were so brief
(Ian McEwan’s On Chesil Beach and Julian Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending)
that many questioned whether they could be considered as novels at all.
Two years ago, there was a huge row when one of the judges suggested
that for him a book needed to “zip along” to pass the selection test,
prompting criticism that the prize had dumbed down with “readability”
taking precedence over “artistic achievement.” This year’s choice is a
riposte to critics on both counts. Good literature transcends
considerations of structure and size. Robert Macfarlane, chairman of the
judges, described The Luminaries as a “dazzling book, vast
without being sprawling.” Hailed as a “compelling’’ thriller, it is set
against the background of the 19th century New Zealand gold rush. The
story is told through a complicated plot structure divided into 12
zodiac-themed chapters, each decreasing in length in conjunction with
the lunar cycle. Judges acknowledged that readers needed to make a “huge
investment” in getting to grips with it, but the effort was worth it.
At 28, Catton is the youngest ever writer to win the Booker, beating Ben Okri, who was 32 when he won it for The Famished Road in 1991. It is after 28 years that a New Zealander has won the prize since Keri Hulme got it for The Bone People
in 1985. That was a controversial choice, still cited after so many
years as an example of the Booker’s “eccentric’’ ways. Perhaps no other
literary prize is scrutinised as closely as Booker amid persistent
rumours about its imminent death. Consistently, however, it has always
proved its critics wrong, demonstrating that even after 45 years, there
is still life left in the old beast. In India, there will be
disappointment that Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Lowland missed out and
elsewhere too, critics will carp that their favourite was ignored. But
that’s the beauty of Booker — its unpredictability. From next year, the
prize will be open to American and other writers with British
publishers, making the competition tougher — and adding to the drama
that has become so much a part of one of the English-speaking world’s
most storied prizes for writing.
(The Editorial, The Hindu, 17:10:2013)
(‘The
Luminaries’, set in 1866, contains a group of 12 men gathered for a
meeting in a hotel and a traveller who stumbles into their midst; the
story involves a missing rich man, a dead hermit, a huge amount in gold,
and a beatenup whore. The multiple voices take turns to tell their own
stories and gradually what happened in the small town of Hokitika on New
Zealand’s South Island is revealed.
The novel was up against
Indian-American writer Jhumpa Lahiri’s ‘The Lowland’— a story of a young
man’s tryst with the Naxalite movement at the cost of his family. Set
in Kolkata, ‘The Lowland’ was among six books shortlisted for the prize.)
_______________________